{"id":295,"date":"2010-03-02T23:43:30","date_gmt":"2010-03-02T21:43:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theusrus.de\/blog\/?p=295"},"modified":"2010-03-02T23:43:30","modified_gmt":"2010-03-02T21:43:30","slug":"homeland-security-and-uniform-priors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theusrus.de\/blog\/homeland-security-and-uniform-priors\/","title":{"rendered":"Homeland Security and Uniform Priors"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Now that the German Constitutional Court has <a href=\"http:\/\/news.smh.com.au\/breaking-news-technology\/german-court-orders-telecoms-records-deleted-20100303-pgo5.html\" target=\"_blank\">judged<\/a> that the so called &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/de.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Vorratsdatenspeicherung\" target=\"_blank\">Vorratsdatenspeicherung<\/a>&#8221; &#8211; the data retention for six months of all phone calls and e-mails to prepare against potential terrorist threats &#8211; to be inconsistent with the German constitution, discussions will heat up again regarding the best or at least necessary means to protect against potential terrorist actions. The same court has already ruled out to use dragnet investigation except for the case of an &#8220;actual threat&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" title=\"xray\" src=\"http:\/\/www.theusRus.de\/Blog-files\/xray.png\" alt=\"xray\" width=\"575\" height=\"329\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Things like dragnet investigations and passenger screening at airports are actually pretty much relevant for the application of statistical methods and data analysis tasks. Whereas for dragnet investigations we rely on the fact that &#8220;ordinary citizens&#8221; will somehow &#8220;live&#8221; in the central 99% percent of some multivariate distribution (and someone who prepares a plot will stick out as a multivariate outlier), airport passenger screenings make the odd assumption that all passengers pose the same threat as they are all processed the same way.<\/p>\n<p>The luckily unsuccessful &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/blog\/post.cfm?id=what-could-have-stopped-the-christm-2009-12-28\" target=\"_blank\">Christmas Bomber<\/a>&#8221; raised the question again, of whether or not to adopt the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.schneier.com\/blog\/archives\/2010\/01\/adopting_the_is.html\" target=\"_blank\">Israeli airport security model<\/a>. This model heavily relies on the personal judgement of the (psychologically) trained screening officer, who looks at the passenger and asks a set of well prepared (from a passenger&#8217;s view apparently unstructured) questions. Depending on your answers and reaction (and of course other hard facts), you may walk straight through or miss your flight due to heavy further questioning and examination. (I am very much in favor of this system as the few times I flew to Israel so far, I apparently looked that harmless that I always walked right through &#8211; which was actually the right decision of the officers &#8230;)<\/p>\n<p>There are certainly many technical issues that need to be addressed if (bigger) airports around the world would try to use this model, but it seems to be odd to assume that every passenger has the same a-priori probability to be a security problem, i.e., the white haired granny from Iowa and the 30 year old arabic male who departed from Syria &#8211; they are certainly equally treated by our constitutions, but boarding a plane is still no constitutional right.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Now that the German Constitutional Court has judged that the so called &#8220;Vorratsdatenspeicherung&#8221; &#8211; the data retention for six months of all phone calls and e-mails to prepare against potential terrorist threats &#8211; to be inconsistent with the German constitution, discussions will heat up again regarding the best or at least necessary means to protect [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-295","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theusrus.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theusrus.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theusrus.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theusrus.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theusrus.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=295"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.theusrus.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":362,"href":"https:\/\/www.theusrus.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295\/revisions\/362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theusrus.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theusrus.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=295"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theusrus.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}